Tag Archives: blogs

How reviews influence my choice of books

Once upon a time it seemed as though I had hours and hours a day in which to read. I devoured books at an impressive rate. Although I’m not a particularly fast reader, I made up for it in sheer number of hours devoted to the cause.

But that was before I started writing in the evenings, watched less TV, and there was no such thing as social media, let alone a blog.

So. Since these other things do now exist, my reading time has been slashed to negligible… unless I suddenly find myself consumed by a book to the exclusion of most other things for a few days or so.

This all means choosing what to read carries rather more weight than once it did. Particularly as there is now so much more choice.

Back in the ‘olden days’ I obtained most of my reading material from the bookshop. It was my one vice as a poor university student: I never begrudged myself spending money on novels. I judged them mainly from reading the blurb on the back of the book and to a lesser extent the cover. Plus I always flicked to random sections in the text to gain an idea of the writing style.

Short of reading reviews in the paper, that was pretty much the only option available. That and word of mouth, of course. And it was hit and miss.

The internet has changed the scene considerably. Now we can google any book we like and find a hundred reviews on various bookshop sites, newspaper portals and book blogs. These days, everyone has an opinion and is willing to share it. This behaviour is even encouraged!

Moreover, we now hear about books we might never otherwise have heard of, via Amazon recommendation algorithms and social media shares. No more the somewhat limited shelves of the local bookshop. Now the options are virtually unlimited.

So how does one choose? Aside from those books that generate buzz — such as award finalists and winners, or blatant bestsellers — it can be difficult. Invariably I tend to investigate books based on recommendations I come across in the interwebs and blogosphere. Then of course there are all the books written by my writer friends, who I try to support.

Since I’m buying a lot on Kindle, I do tend to read a few of the Amazon reviews to get a general indication of whether it sounds to be my kind of book, but it’s very difficult to gauge quality. Mind you, I’m a fairly forgiving reader if the story is gripping enough. But I don’t think I set a huge store on the number of stars, because there is so much disparity of opinion and taste. Not to mention understanding of how the star-rating system works…

The inspiration for this post was the fourth of my eleven questions: Do reviews influence your choice of reads? My bottom line answer would be yes, but not for the obvious reason. The simple fact that reviews are so prevalent means that they’re bringing books to my attention and influencing my choice by providing more information about books than I would otherwise have.

Reviews have largely replaced the bookshop shelves as the source of my information — because let’s face the very sad fact that most of the bookshops seem to be closing down. And it can still be hit and miss.

For the record: I am currently reading Dragon Haven, by Robin Hobb. I was given the audiobook of this and its predecessor, Dragon Keeper, but soon downloaded both onto my Kindle so I can read and listen in tandem. It’s kind of like playing tag. Thus, in this case, reviews had zero impact on my choice, although I have read some to see what other people thought of the books. I may even feel compelled to ‘review’ them myself here when I’m done. ;-)

What about you? How do you choose books? What are you reading right now and how did you choose it?


The Versatile Blogger – a show of solidarity

A lovely thing happened to me this week: the Versatile Blogger recognition was bestowed on me not once, but twice. Massive thanks to my new cyberfriends Julie Kenner/J.K Beck and Carrie Daws for the honour. I think it’s perhaps more a show of blogging solidarity and support as indication of any blogging genius on my part, but it’s very welcome all the same.

Anyway, there are evidently rules associated with this recognition. One must thank and apply links to the person who nominated one (as demonstrated above), reveal seven facts about oneself, and nominate a whole 14 new recipients who ideally haven’t received it already. (Although apparently in some circles one can nominate a mere five other bloggers — and this for me right now is ve-ry tempting.)

First, the seven things to be revealed about me…

1. I have a collection of carnivorous plants. I’ve been growing them since I was a teenager (I remember writing a year 12 informative essay on the subject) and many of the Sarracenia pitcher plants I have now are more than 20 years old! These days I’ve merged them into ornamental combination pots, in which the sticky-leafed Sundews grow like weeds.

2. I’m getting quite good at disposing of dead rodents. You see, I have this devilcat who keeps bringing them inside in the middle of the night (yes, I know I should keep her locked up) and depositing them half-mangled in the middle of my bedroom floor. The most recent one was arranged artfully in the doorway, just where I might stumble upon it in bare feet, bleary-eyed at 6am… (except I didn’t, thank goodness!)

3. When eating out, my favourite meal is breakfast. I’m really lucky where I live, because we have several excellent cafes with even more excellent coffee to choose from. It could be the coffee, or the eggs, or merely the ambience of lazing away an hour or two on a weekend morning (or sometime both mornings!), but I love it and if I miss a weekend I feel really deprived.

4. I love opera. My grandmother introduced me to opera when I was a young adult and there was a spare ticket going. Later, I accompanied her on a season’s ticket, just the two of us — real grandmother/granddaughter bonding time. My favourite moments tend to be duets and quartets etc, when there are wonderful harmonies threaded out of pure single voices. I think Bizet’s ‘In the depths of the temple’ from The Pearl Fishers is one of the all time most amazing sounds. My throat thickens now, just to think of it.

5. Every now and then I get adventurous. It rears up in me at odd times. For example, nearly two years ago I completed the Oxfam Trailwalker charity event (walked 100km in under 48 hours). When in high school I developed a fondness for rock climbing and bushwalking. I’ve trekked in Nepal too (although not as far as Everest Base Camp, which I would love to do one day). Currently I have a yearning to trek the Mont Blanc circuit in Europe.

6. I am fascinated by and drawn to birds of prey. Especially peregrine falcons.  I have no idea why. I do remember being entranced by the Catherine Gaskin novel, A Falcon for a Queen, long ago, in which a main character was never to be found without his beloved peregrine. Other than that…? In any case, I will sniff out any bird of prey sanctuary or flying demonstration. And get very distressed if they are stuck in cages and cannot fly.

7. I have a cracking recipe for New York Baked Cheesecake! I came across it from a friend of a friend years and years ago, and it’s never let me down yet. But it’s very very bad for you… although dairy is calcium and protein, right?

Gosh, that was harder than I expected. And now for the part where I pass on the baton of The Versatile Blogger! I nominate:

Natalie Potts

E. Markham

Jason Nahrung

Foz Meadows

Brian Holers

Jessica Chambers

Tracie McBride

I’m going with seven for now, and reserve the right (if I’m allowed) to nominate up to another seven in a few weeks’ time. I have a feeling I’m going to be introduced to a lot of cool blogs in the next month or two! But in the meantime, if you’re not following already, check out the blogs of the above fabulous people (and Julie and Carrie’s as well).

 


More on writers and platform pressure

Oh my, the debate about writers and platform expectations is still raging. Over the past couple of days I’ve spent hours knee-deep in blog posts and reader comments, my little introvert heart pounding with apprehension. (Hours not writing, I might add…)

Rachelle Gardner’s post on Wednesday talked about the need to quantify the size of your platform when dealing with publishers. And even though, as she goes on to explain in the comments section, she’s merely talking about how to describe platform and not how to attract a publisher (although the two are linked), I’ll confess that some of the numbers Ms Gardner has thrown about recently (such as 15,000 unique blog visits per month) have given me heart palpitations.

But it seems I am not alone in this. In addition to the posts by Anne R Allen and Roni Loren I mentioned last week, and numerous comments to the aforementioned post by RG, Jami Gold has written a response to RG’s post that questions how much can all these numbers (Klout ratings, number of unique blog hits, number of Twitter followers) actually mean? Ms Gold (and many of her readers who commented) wonders how much impact social media metrics (which are not necessarily a true indication of how many people one is actually engaging with, and can moreover be quite easily rigged) have in actually selling books.

I think deep down everyone knows that the numbers are meaningless if the book isn’t wonderful. No-one is disputing that. But this increasing emphasis on establishing an impressive platform is certainly getting a lot of writers depressed, as it seems like yet another hurdle to be surmounted in the quest for publication. Not to mention an enormous drain on time and energy. Just how much time should we devote to blogging and tweeting — not to mention reading blogs and following tweets (i.e. actually engaging and connecting)?

In terms of effectiveness, I certainly don’t think a strong platform can hurt — for example, I recently purchased one of Anne R Allen’s recently re-published novels, simply because I follow her blog and thus feel some kind of connection to her as an author. I can only presume many of her blog audience will do likewise, so there are probably several hundred (more?) sales.

But my instinct is that the great majority of readers out there don’t actually read author blogs or follow authors on twitter. Roni Loren posed the question on her ‘author’ blog this week, asking what readers wanted out of an author web site… and all the comments I could see were from other writers (who, yes, are readers too, but…).

Most non-writing readers I know follow blogs on knitting or food or cats or parenting or natural remedies… They might follow the blog of a select favourite author(s), but I suspect even that would describe a minority.

Am I wrong?

The case may be a little different on facebook. It’s very easy to ‘like’ or subscribe to an author and henceforth receive their updates, whether details on appearances and book launches, or everyday observations in the mode of FB updates. Perhaps this is a better means of reaching a spread of readers than a blog (which could of course feed into the author fan page). I would argue that one would need the readers first, however.

And then of course there’s the question of those readers who don’t engage with social media at all. Right now, there are plenty of people out there who eschew facebook and/or twitter and/or never read blogs. Not that this is likely to be a permanent state of affairs. I think it’s fair to say that social media will continue to grow in importance as a means of achieving the all-important word-of-mouth promotion of books, which everyone knows is the key.

I think buzz about a great book will be spread via twitter etc, particularly as the percentage of the population engaged increases. I just don’t know how great a part the author-originated blog or twitter stream will play in all this.

Nevertheless, marketing of a book must start somewhere, and the powers-that-be have decreed that a significant load lies with the author via social (as well as more traditional forms of) media. So platform remains essential whether we like it or not. Assuming for a moment that the numbers do mean something, the question then becomes how to make them impressive — particularly when you’re a not-yet published author?

How do you reach 15,000 unique hits per months on your blog, without having publication credentials to back you up? (Tongue-firmly-in-cheek.)

Some of the blogs I’ve started reading (with or without publication credentials) are approaching this figure by offering advice and information about writing and related topics on which their authors have specific knowledge or interest. It usually comes down to content, although sometimes it’s just sheer force of personality. (And I reckon the audience is still mostly other writers.) But not everyone is endowed with masses of virtual charisma or pools of wisdom.

According to social media writer guru Kristen Lamb (in another post discussing platform metrics), the key is connecting with readers beyond writers. I still don’t know how this is supposed to be possible when one doesn’t yet have anything published for would-be readers to, you know, read (and as I’ve discussed I’m not convinced non-writing readers actually read author blogs anyway), but — what the hey — I’ve signed up for her online workshop to find out.

I figure I might as well discover how to better leverage this blog, one way or another. I know this is a turn-around from last week’s post, but something Ms Lamb wrote resonated with me: Why spend all this time blogging for a small bunch of readers? If I’m going to spend the time then I might as well try to make it count! My instinct is still to fly under the radar, to not put myself forward, but if I have to engage in the social media space, then I might as well do so efficiently and effectively.

 


What I get out of blogging

Today I’m going to muse on a topic that has been floating around the writing industry blogosphere the past week or so — which is what writers get out of blogging and how big a ‘platform’ novelists need in order to sell books (or to even be considered for publication by the larger publishers). Anne R Allen and Roni Loren both have written great posts on the subject with lots of links.

I’m going to duck the ‘selling books’ aspect of this discussion, since that’s not exactly in my purview at the moment. But the question of platform is one that I’ve been thinking about all year, ever since I started this blog and joined twitter etc.

I first started blogging anonymously elsewhere in 2006. I had Things To Say: thoughts on books and movies, cafes and holidays, rants about the latest terrible customer service, favourite recipes… you probably get the picture. My personal writing journey featured heavily as well. What that blog doesn’t have is a distinct theme. It’s essentially a snapshot of my life.

But that blog was — and still is — as much for me as anyone else. An online diary of stuff I find interesting and inspiring and memorable. Its regular readers are my friends and family; although, as is the nature of blogs, some posts get regular external hits from googlers on the interwebs. The point is: I don’t care how many hits it gets. I keep that blog because I want to and I enjoy it.

And then last year it was borne upon me that, if I wanted to be taken seriously as a writer, I needed a public persona online. A web site that industry professionals could find and use to engage with me — should they choose to do so. It was time to be brave and eschew anonymity.

And so this blog was launched in January of this year. A blog about writing and my writing journey. A statement that I am serious and committed and passionate about being a writer.

I’ve always enjoyed blogging about writing, and a dedicated writing blog allows me to explore writing topics in more depth. The most likely audience is other writers, who can likely empathise with many of the issues I discuss, but I don’t delude myself that the majority of readers aren’t people I already know.

Should I care about the number of blog readers I have? I’ve always felt that it would be foolish to expect a high number of hits — after all, I still fall under the banner of ‘aspiring’. Sure, people I don’t know might find the odd post of interest, but why would they keep checking in to see where I’m at? (If/when I’m ever published, it would become a completely different scenario.)

I would of course like to have lots of readers. (Every writer wants an audience.) I gather the way to make blog-friends is to read everyone else’s blogs and leave comments so they come and visit yours. But, while I would love to do this in principle, I don’t know how people find the time. I regularly get overwhelmed by the number of writers — published and unpublished — who blog!

Having said that, for a successful blog you definitely need to have compelling content (and this is where the blog elite cite the Art Of Blogging). I do know of several very successful bloggers who have first novels pending — meaning they must have established their platform as unpublished writers. These writers are obviously just fantastic at the art of blogging and social networking.

(It’s worth mentioning here that some of the wider industry debate surrounds whether authors should avoid blogging about writing itself, so as not to bore readers. This obviously presupposes you have published works and a bunch of non-writerly fans. I would imagine that readers might find insight into the authorial process interesting . . . but then again that might be because I’m a writer. It would be interesting to know what proportion of non-writerly readers subscribe to the blogs of favourite authors. It wouldn’t surprise me at all if the vast majority of blog readers are writers too.)

As an unpublished (fiction) writer, I’ve always been content to fly underneath the radar. My approach with blogging and social networking is no different — for better or worse. I cannot see the point of worrying about platform before I even know whether I’m a good enough writer to need one.

So I have this blog, my tiny presence on the interwebs, from which to occasionally engage with the wider community (every so often I stick my head up and leave a comment somewhere). All readers are welcome, and I’ll endeavour to be interesting and foster conversation; but my focus is (must be) on writing fiction – learning the craft, producing the words.

 


On writing & discipline

It is an unequivocal truth that novels do not write themselves. Irrespective of how many words a writer can produce in an hour, or how many hours in a day (or even a week) can be made available to write, the fact remains that every single word and every single minute counts.

Today I am mostly concerned with the minutes and the hours – because it is so very easy to allow potential writing time to dissipate like smoke in air. Just yesterday I took myself off to meet a fellow writer in the pub. Armed with computers we were supposed to enjoy three solid hours of writing time away from the Interwebs, but instead substituted one distraction for another: chat. Don’t get me wrong, it was very enjoyable. Stimulating too, for we conversed on writing topics (mostly). But neither of us were disciplined enough to seize the opportunity we had cursed well created for ourselves to write!

Beating the Interwebs, however, is the far bigger challenge for me on an ongoing basis – particularly as my use of social networking increases. I am reading more blogs, clicking through to more links . . . and now I’ve just joined Twitter (@ellenvgreg). I posted on the lure of the blog maze not too long ago, so I won’t repeat myself, but Twitter has only amplified my propensity for distraction as it points me to even more blogs and writing sites. You might say that of late the blog maze has been winning.

So. Discipline. I need to set some new rules.

The other day I came across Zadie Smith’s rules for writers (directed from a Twitter feed, of course). They are a beautifully succinct list of all the things I know I should be doing and it was great to be reminded. In light of my current discussion, I want to draw attention to two of them in particular:

7 . Work on a computer that is disconnected from the ­Internet.
8.  Protect the time and space in which you write. Keep everybody away from it, even the people who are most important to you.

Such wise words. But in order to work on a computer disconnected from the Internet I need to get away from the house. (Alas, I don’t think it’s in me to switch off the modem.) This is where the pub usually works well, and I have also had some success writing alone in a local cafe. My current intention is to continue with the weekly pub sessions (with greater discipline) and to visit the cafe a couple of times each week in the afternoon. Aside from the improved productivity, it’s great to have a change of scene and a nice cup of coffee.

For the rest of the time, writing at home, the new rule is that I must write for at least two hours in the morning before opening Twitter, clicking on any links or reading any blogs. This will hopefully prevent the scenario that I reach lunchtime and I still haven’t opened the WIP!

I should point out that, since I am not working at present, I am probably suffering from the curse of ‘too much time’ overall. I think they call it Parkinson’s Law — work expands to fill the time available. Most writers have jobs and families, and have to squeeze in their precious writing time around a barrage of other commitments. I think this can actually help with self-discipline — isn’t there an adage that says the busiest people get the most done?

I know I’m never again going to have as much time as this to experiment with social media (or exercise, or meet friends for lunch, or sleep in. . .), but nor will I have this much writing time again either. Since getting a novel published is the end-game, writing said novel really must come first. I know from experience that I can be disciplined enough to fit writing in around a full-time professional job, but I would really like exploit my current opportunity and achieve as much as possible. So finding new ways to get disciplined and efficient are imperative!

I’m interested in how other writers maximise their writing time and force themselves to be disciplined. Any tips?


Why I write fantasy

Literary agent Rachelle Gardner recently ran a readership poll on her extremely popular blog and has now published the results. Of particular interest to me (and her, as it turns out) is that 26% of writerly survey respondents write science-fiction/fantasy (SFF), making it the most popular represented genre. The next most popular was general/’non-genre’ fiction (21%), followed by women’s fiction (12%). Supernatural/paranormal had its own genre category and came in 5th at 10%.

Since as an agent Ms Gardner represents just about any genre except SFF (and specialises in the Christian market) this is quite remarkable — and testament to the quality of her blog content. It also prompted her to speculate whether more writers are producing SFF than is reflected by market demand. A mini vox pop of sales seemed to support this hunch and the debate was thrown open to reader comments.

What followed was a lively discussion about the market for SFF and why so many people are writing it. Some ignorant people inevitably made some rather insulting comments about writing SFF, vis: it must be fun because you don’t have to do research or worry about verisimilitude (arrgh); SFF writers must be seeking to escape the real world due to the global financial crisis; assumptions that all fantasy is Tolkienesque; SFF writers must be trying to cash in on a perceived market and wouldn’t write it if they weren’t trying to sell a manuscript…

I confess I felt a little incensed on reading some of the comments, and although plenty of SFF writers jumped in to refute them, it has prompted me to reflect here on why I write fantasy and do some of my own refuting.

Actually, the reason I write fantasy is easy: it’s because I love to read it. It all comes down to ‘write what you love’.

There’s a strong element of ‘write what you know’ as well. I read a lot of fantasy and I connect with it, so it feels perfectly natural for me to write it. I think many people don’t understand that fantasy is largely about real stuff — characters just as real as any fictional character, with the same spectrum of emotions, faced with the same tough decisions, interacting with each other in the way humans do (note: the vast majority of fantasy characters are human).

Moreover, in just about every fantasy world there are reflections of our own. Urban fantasy is indeed set in a version of our own world; in the case of epic fantasy, which is usually set in a made-up world, elements of that world are often drawn from this world’s history and culture. To illustrate this, consider the classic fantasy trope of horse riding to get around. Or what is used for sources of illumination. Or food. Or materials. Not all these will appear as ‘familiar’ in every fantasy novel, but you can be certain that other reflections of our world will be present instead.

This is why the comment about ‘don’t have to do research’ really annoyed me. There is plenty of research that needs to be done so that all the little familiar details are accurate. These provide the foundation on which the fantastical world is based — and that’s when the hard work begins. Because the moment something is invented, or skewed, its ramifications for everything else must be determined. Magic always has a price, inventing creatures requires whole ecologies to be developed, and creating cultures and political histories opens up a can of worms that must be subdued and controlled.

I love it. Immersing myself in someone else’s richly realised world is delicious, like being an armchair tourist (except you actually wish you could go there). And creating my own world is thrilling and challenging. I can see why non-converts can be dismissive of fantasy as merely ’escapist’, but it’s an ignorant and narrow view. I read (and write) fantasy because it adds another layer to the journey of discovery. In addition to a conspiracy/mystery/family secret/relationship to be uncovered, there’s a whole world waiting to be revealed as well.

Even more significantly, in addition to adding texture and wonder, the fantastic world provides a canvass for the exploration of grand themes. Ultimately the imaginary world becomes the stomping ground of a cast of characters who are tested by love, betrayal, prejudice, greed, violence, guilt, hatred, rage along with everything else. Fantasy allows us to strip everything back to the bones and invent the perfect crucible into which we toss our characters to see what they’ll do.

It’s not about ‘escaping’ reality, but embracing it. Fantasy allows us to probe and examine the fundamental themes of life and consider what makes us human.

I totally understand that fantasy isn’t for everyone. But I hope I’ve provided some insight into why it’s hands-down my favourite genre. And, judging from the stats on Rachelle Gardner’s poll, I’m obviously not alone in that. It would be fabulous if one day fantasy/SFF could lose the literary stigma that plagues it to allow a wider audience to enjoy the wonders too.

Image:
Fantasy Art 3D Wallpapers, digital art pictures gallery. free computer desktop backgrounds.


Good advice

Last week I stumbled upon Anne R. Allen’s Blog and she has some incredibly sensible things to say about writers and blogging. Her series of posts on blogging (highlighted in her side bar) covers tips on content, search-engine optimisation, pitfalls to avoid . . . and how to attract readers. Highly recommended reading.

On the last point she emphasises the need to engage with the community by commenting regularly (and insightfully) on blogs that you read, thereby spiking interest and luring other readers over to your blog. Does this work, do you think? I’m not sure — it’s rare that I click-through to the blog of a commenter on someone else’s blog, and if I do it’s usually because I already recognise the name. I will keep it in mind though, and perhaps stop lurking so much… and bear in mind that such a strategy will only work if the content of my own blog is sufficiently engaging to keep readers coming back.

Anne’s blog also introduced me to the concept of ‘Slow Blogging’, which is essentially occasional but regular posting. Again it comes down to the fact that most writers should be spending time writing things other than blog posts (i.e. novels, if that’s your thing). This to me makes so much sense; it’s so easy to convince yourself that you should be posting every day or so in order to keep readers returning.

I am going to try this Slow Blogging scenario, which will probably mean weekly posts on Wednesdays, unless something comes up in between that I simply must discuss or voice. The focus will remain essentially a journal of my writing life, with occasional thoughts on industry hot topics.

Which brings me to one final post-worth-reading on Anne R. Allen’s blog that I wanted to mention, because it relates to my recent post on self-publishing and was in fact the post that drew me to her blog in the first place. Her post was written in response to the recent social media maelstrom and cyber-bullying that occurred when an indie author made some ill-considered responses to a less-than-glowing review of her ebook.

Anne poses three insightful questions to ask yourself before considering self-publishing:
1. Are you able to present a professional book in a professional way? (i.e. hire editors, designers, coders etc)
2. Are you emotionally ready for your close-up? (1.e. you’d better have very tough skin, because every book gets bad reviews, no matter how good it is)
3. Is you book really, truly ready?

Of these, I believe question number #2 resonated with me in particular. As Anne puts it:

There are some unspoken benefits to the old query-fail-query-fail-submission-fail-editorial meeting-fail, fail, fail system. It not only gives us numerous readers to help hone that book to perfection—it also teaches us to deal with rejection, failure and bad reviews. 


Lure of the blog maze

These days a great many writing resources – particularly in the form of blogs – can be found on the Interwebs. There are blogging agents, blogging editors, blogging authors, not to mention blogging aspirants, by the bucketload. These blogs all take different forms: some are instructional, filled with great advice; others contain well thought-out essays on aspects of genre; many are reflective, personal journeys; and then there are those which pose questions and host interesting discussions in the comments sections.

One could quite easily spend all day, every day reading blogs and never actually get any writing done. Not only are there those blogs one might choose to read regularly, there are usually multiple links to other blogs and interesting discussions . . . it’s a bit like being lured into a maze masquerading as a dessert buffet.

For example, I spent a couple of hours yesterday evening reading an interesting discussion across three blogs on whether there is a perception that male and female fantasy authors write romance/sex/relationships differently, how the gender of the point-of-view character makes a difference, and how readers of different genders respond to these nuances. It was a fascinating discussion, with many excellent points raised that certainly relate to my own writing. But . . . it was two hours during which I wasn’t writing!

Moreover, it left me with the certain knowledge that there are many more such interesting discussions going on around the place. And the daunting question of how many blogs I need to tune into regularly in order to keep abreast of all the hot topics in the industry. Facebook groups such as the Australian Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association cross-post up to 10 links a day, each one exposing me to a new and fascinating web site or blog. Yesterday this also included two ‘top 10 writing blogs’ that I wasn’t previously aware of . . . surely I should be reading these regularly at the very least?! (And what are the other eight . . .?)

Perhaps the most daunting aspect is that when one finds a new highly recommended writing blog — such as The Creative Penn or Storyfix.com – there is a whole archive of material ready and waiting to be inhaled. Do I meter it out as a reward for a quality writing session? Allow myself a strictly timed procrastination period? Or gorge it all at once, taking the attitude that it’s best to get it out of the way?

No matter how many writing-related blogs one reads, they all have the following advice: just write (damn it!). But obviously it’s also important — or at least beneficial — to keep abreast of the broader community, not to mention continue to grow as a writer, hone skills and all that. Somehow one has to find the right balance of stimulation versus output. (And I haven’t even touched on twitter or the numerous podcasts that seem to be emerging.) Somehow one needs to be selective and incredibly disciplined as well.

Now I had better go and write for a bit!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 310 other followers